Virgo Galaxy Walk


Domingos Soares

June 17, 2016





Abstract

I put forward a scale model of a galaxy system — a Galaxy Walk. The real system scaled down is the Virgo cluster of galaxies, from the Milky Way, located in its periphery, to its center, approximately where sits the giant elliptical galaxy M87. The “Virgo Galaxy Walk” serves as a motivation for an informal approach to extragalactic astronomy, as already happens with respect to solar system astronomy through planet walks that exist in many places.



1. Introduction

The use of scale models for teaching, generally speaking, is widespread. Particularly, solar-system scale models are well common, either at the scale size of a classroom desk or at larger scales of the order of kilometers. As for the latter, one may mention (see details in Aguirre and Lyster 1998) the planetary model of St. Luc, in Switzerland, with 6 km, the one at the Boston Science Museum, in the United States, 15 km, and also in the United States, the Sagan Planet Walk, in Ithaca, New York state, with 1.2 km. All of these models have Pluto in their tours, since it had not been yet reclassified as a dwarf planet on the dates of their establishments.

Inspired on these models specially on Sagan Planet Walk (see Soares 2015a, 2015b), from which I borrow the terminology of “station” for the walk stops, and on the “Flight to the Virgo cluster” of the Canadian astronomer R. Brent Tully (Tully 2003) I put forward the “Virgo Galaxy Walk” (hereafter referred to as VGW). VGW is a scaled model of the Virgo cluster from its periphery, where the Local Group of galaxies sits, and therein the Milky Way galaxy, to the cluster center represented by the fabulous giant elliptical galaxy Messier 87, also known as NGC 4486 and radio source Virgo A, the most powerful source of radio waves of the Virgo cluster.

In the same way as solar planetary walks represent our planetary home, the VGW represents our extragalactic home, that is, the home of the galaxy group where our Milky Way is. The VGW becomes, therefore, an excellent tool for engaging people with the realm of extragalactic astronomical objects.

Next section presents the VGW 11 stations, images and features of the galaxies and of the Virgo cluster. The final section concludes with some additional remarks.

2. The Walk

The Virgo cluster of galaxies is a large group of approximately 2,000 galaxies, assembled by their mutual gravitational attraction. Its name comes from the region of the celestial sphere where it sits, namely, in the zodiacal constellation of Virgo. The Milky Way galaxy is located in the periphery of Virgo cluster in the Local Group.

The Local Group of galaxies and the Virgo cluster are part of a larger agglomeration called “Local Supercluster” or “Laniakea Supercluster”. Laniakea is a Hawaiian term that means “immeasurable heaven” coined by the above-mentioned R. Brent Tully who is at the University of Hawaii (Tully et al. 2014; watch also the illustrative video that accompanies the article).

The VGW begins at the Milky Way (Soares 2008) and ends in the center of the Virgo cluster at M87 (Soares 2009). It is constituted of 11 stations, each one of them represented by one galaxy, 5 of them in the Local Group and 6 in the Virgo cluster. The Local Group galaxies were chosen by their obvious prominence, i.e., they are the best known in the Group. The Virgo galaxies were chosen, with the exception of M87 in the center, in such a way to span across a variety of distances more or less uniformly spread between the Local Group and M87. The Walk is shown on Table I and on figure 1. The Walk exemplified here has 4 km, which corresponds to a scale in extension of 54×106 light-year/4 km = 130 billions of billions to 1 (cf. data of station 11).


Table I – Virgo Galaxy Walk

Station Galaxy Distancea from
Milky Way (light-year)
Distanceb in
scale (metre)
1 Milky Way
2 LMCc 0,16×106 (904) 12
3 SMCd 0,20×106 (518) 15
4 Andromeda (M31) 2,6×106 (325) 190
5 Triangulum (M33) 2,9×106 (119) 210
6 IC 3718 22×106 (1) 1,600
7 NGC 4488 26×106 (1) 1,900
8 NGC 4064 33×106 (14) 2,400
9 NGC 4438 44×106 (5) 3,200
10 M49 52×106 (63) 3,800
11 M87 54×106 (103) 4,000

Notes: (a) Average distances extracted from NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED); the number in parentheses is the number of distances found in NED (search made in February 2016). (b) Scale in which the distance Milky Way–M87 is 4,000 m. (c) Large Magellanic Cloud. (d) Small Magellanic Cloud.




Figure 1

Virgo Galaxy Walk shown so one has a feeling of the distances among the galaxies in the Walk. The two external circles represent the five galaxies of the Local Group. The thicker lines tracing these two circles indicate that the distances between galaxies, in this scale, are very small. The outermost circle represents the Milky Way and the Magellanic clouds and the next circle the Triangulum (M33) and Andromeda (M31) galaxies.


The distances retrieved from NED are average values of measurements unrelated to the galaxy redshifts, i.e., they represent the actual distances to the objects. Distances obtained from applying Hubble's law to redshifts are not physical distances because redshifts are contaminated by galaxies peculiar motions, both in the Virgo cluster and in the Local Group. The methods used for distance determinations are of various kinds and use different physical properties. Some of these methods are mentioned here only for illustration purposes; they are: method of brightest stars, of Cepheid variables, of the color-magnitude diagram, of the luminosity function of globular clusters, of nova stars, of the tip of the red giant branch, of Tully-Fisher, of Faber-Jackson, etc. The reader interested in more details about these methods can easily find them in the specialized scientific literature (some of them were used, for example, in obtaining the 103 distance measurements of M87 that are catalogued in NED — see ned.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/nDistance?name=M87).

Figure 2 shows a map with the 600 brightest galaxies of Virgo cluster prepared by Powell (2006). The 6 galaxies that are part of the Walk are marked and may be confronted with the data of Table I.



Figure 2

The 600 brightest galaxies of the Virgo cluster of galaxies according to Powell (2006). VGW's galaxies are earmarked. Notice that the proximity of galaxies amongst themselves on the map does not necessarily mean physical proximity, but only apparent projected proximity on the sky plane. For example, M87 and NGC 4438, very close on the map, are in fact greatly separated; the same with M49 and NGC 4488 (cf. Table I). The white bar shown in the lower right corner indicates the scale of the map: 1 degree, equivalent to twice the apparent diameter of the full moon. The Virgo cluster occupies a projected circular area on the sky of approximately 10 degrees in diameter. At the distance of the cluster 1 degree is equivalent to 1×106 light-year. (Credit: Richard Powell).


Figures 3 through 8 show the 11 galaxies that belong to the VGW. A short note about each of them appears in the figure labels.



Figure 3

First station, Milky Way, a spiral galaxy seen edge-on. On the top, imaged in the visible and below in the infrared. The image in the visible favors young stars, of large mass and very bright. One should note the dark stripes and bands made of interstellar dust that block star light. The image in the infrared shows, mainly, low-mass stars, very old, responsible for the majority of Milky Way's stellar mass. The Sun is like them (Soares 2008). One question: would we — the Sun — be anywhere on these images? [Credits: ESO/S. Brunier (visible) and NASA/COBE-DIRBE].




Figure 4

On the left, the second station, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). On the right, the third station, the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Both are satellite galaxies of the Milky Way. LMC is a barred spiral, with some irregularities. SMC is an irregular galaxy. They are dwarf galaxies and have masses much smaller than the Milky Way mass (Soares 2007). [Credits: NASA/Ames Research Center (LMC) and DSS/Digitized Sky Survey].




Figure 5

On the left, the fourth station, M31, the Great Andromeda Nebula, is a spiral galaxy, the largest galaxy of the Local Group. On the right, the fifth station, M33, the Triangulum galaxy, another spiral galaxy, also belonging to the Local Group and the third in mass of the group (Soares 2008). [Credits: Robert Gendler (M31) and AAO/D. Malin].




Figure 6

On the left, the sixth station, IC 3718, a spiral galaxy. On the right, the seventh station, NGC 4488, barred spiral galaxy. (Credits: DSS/Digitized Sky Survey).




Figure 7

On the left, the eighth station, NGC 4064, barred spiral galaxy. On the right, NGC 4435 and NGC 4438, an interacting pair of galaxies known as “The Eyes”. NGC 4438, the ninth station and the largest of the pair, is a spiral galaxy disturbed by the interaction. [Credits: SDSS/Sloan Digital Sky Survey (NGC 4064) and Ken Crawford].




Figure 8

On the left, the tenth station, M49, giant elliptical galaxy. On the right, M87, the VGW final station, is a giant elliptical galaxy, which exhibits enormous energetic activity, being a powerful source of X-rays and radio waves (cf. Soares 2009). [Credits: DSS/Digitized Sky Survey (M49) and AAO/D. Malin].


3. Final remarks

The VGW presented in Table I assumes a distance Milky Way-M87 of 4,000 m. What would be the minimum extension of the Walk that still allows an identity for each galaxy specially those of the Local Group? Such a minimum limit should result in enough room to the 5 galaxies of the Local Group be presented in the reduced scale, in a such a way that the features of their morphological structure may be seen. With these constraints, the suggestion is that the minimum VGW might have 1,000 m in extension. In this way, the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds could be perfectly accommodated inside a space of the size of a regular classroom (distances in the last column of Table I must be divided by 4).

Two galaxies, IC 3718 (station 6) and NGC 4488 (station 7), have only one measurement of distance (cf. Table I). New measurements are needed to confirm their positions in the VGW. This fact must be taken into account in the construction of the Walk, considering the possibility of future relocation of those stations.

References

E. L. Aguirre, T. Lyster, Walking tours of the solar system, Sky & Telescope, 95 (3), 80 (1998).

R. Powell, The Virgo Cluster (www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/galgrps/vir.html, 2006).

D. Soares, Microcosmology: Sun (www.fisica.ufmg.br/~dsoares/extn/mclg/mclg-sun.htm, 2015a).

D. Soares, Carl Sagan, the praise of scepticism (www.fisica.ufmg.br/~dsoares/sagan/sagan-e.htm, 2015b).

D. Soares, The Local Group of galaxies in The Realm of the Galaxies (www.researchgate.net/publication/350411425, pp. 51-56, 2021a).

D. Soares, Appearances deceive: the giant elliptical galaxy M87 in The Realm of the Galaxies (www.researchgate.net/publication/350411425, pp. 81-86, 2021b).

D. Soares, The Magellanic Clouds, two satellite galaxies of the Milky Way in The Realm of the Galaxies (www.researchgate.net/publication/350411425, pp. 7-12, 2021c).

R. B. Tully, H. Courtois, Y. Hoffman, D. Pomarède, The Laniakea supercluster of galaxies, Nature, 513 (7516), 71 (2014; também em arxiv.org/abs/1409.0880; ver video ilustrativo em irfu.cea.fr/laniakea).

R. B. Tully, Flight to the Virgo cluster (www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~tully/outreach/movie.html, 2003).


Acknowledgements – Figure 1 was made in one of the computers of the Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands, under the auspices of Prof. Reynier Peletier. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

 


Read other articles in www.fisica.ufmg.br/~dsoares/notices-e.htm.